A tropical coastal city skyline with the sun low on the horizon, wind turbines on the hills and solar panels in the foreground

Research & Advisory

What’s changing in Southeast Asia’s markets

Investment announcements, new regulations and industrial policies can point in different directions. We track these developments across seven key sectors to assess what is changing for businesses operating in the region.

Enterprise research and data analytics

We provide data-driven research to help enterprises, investors and project developers understand regulatory conditions, investment incentives and market dynamics across Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam. Our work combines primary-source research, structured data and analytical reports to support strategic planning, investment evaluation and project development.

Market and sector reports

In-depth analysis of policy, industry trends and investment opportunities.

Typical outputs
Country assessments · Sector studies · Cross-market white papers

FDI and investment data analytics

Structured data and comparative analysis across markets and sectors.

Typical outputs
Data-led reports · Investment trend analysis · Charts and executive briefings

Regulatory and incentive research

Source-based research on regulations, incentives and market-entry requirements.

Typical outputs
Regulatory reviews · Incentive comparisons · Requirements matrices

Commissioned research and monitoring

Tailored analysis and ongoing updates for specific markets, sectors or projects.

Typical outputs
Custom white papers · Monitoring updates · Management presentations
See our Regulatory Monitor →

How we treat the numbersOur methodology ↓

Measure precisely.Separate approvals, pledges and realised flows.

Compare carefully.Align periods, sector definitions and reporting basis.

Show the evidence.Cite primary sources and state what remains uncertain.

Sample report

One Business, Four Rulebooks: A Regulatory Comparison of Market Entry in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam

Get a preview of our research. This technical note compares how one manufacturing business model encounters different market-entry rules in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam.

Download a sample report

Tell us where to send it.

By submitting, you agree we may use your details only to send the sample and respond to your request. We never share them. See our Privacy note.

Client questions

From a market question to a project decision

We organise the work around what the client needs to understand.

Can we enter?

Which ownership rules, business restrictions and approvals apply to the proposed activity?

How would it operate?

What licensing, local-production, environmental and other operating conditions need to be addressed?

Where does it fit best?

How do candidate locations differ in policy, incentives, industrial capabilities and implementation?

What has changed?

Which regulatory or market developments require a new assumption or further investigation?

Coverage

Four core markets. Sector-specific depth.

Cross-country research with a defined scope, not a claim to cover every ASEAN market.

  • Indonesia
  • Malaysia
  • Thailand
  • Vietnam

Manufacturing

EVs, components, localisation and production requirements

Mining & downstream

Critical minerals, processing requirements and export conditions

Renewable energy

Project development, power-market rules and investment support

Infrastructure

Industrial parks, logistics and project implementation

Digital & technology

Data centres, investment conditions and technology restrictions

Environmental technology

Environmental requirements and sector-specific investment support

Pharma & healthcare

Pharmaceutical and medical-device manufacturing, product registration and healthcare investment rules

Working in another sector? We scope research case by case.

Ask us →

Our methodology

From paper to practice

In Southeast Asia, policies and investment figures that look comparable can mean very different things across countries. A tax incentive may apply to different activities; an investment figure may count approvals rather than money actually invested.

We define the research question first, then establish exactly what we are measuring: what a rule covers, when it takes effect, who it applies to, and what a given number actually counts.

The result is research that can be checked and compared. It is based on primary sources, explicit about uncertainty, and clear about what the evidence does and does not show.

How the evidence is built

Primary sources

We work from laws, regulations, ministry notices, investment-agency guidance and official statistics, in their original language and read in legal and institutional context.

Verification

Automated workflows help us find relevant documents across jurisdictions and sectors. An analyst then checks the source before a finding is accepted and records where it came from.

Reconciliation

Verified findings are recorded with their amendment history, effective dates, verification status and data vintage, so the record can be followed back to the underlying source.

Interpretation

We separate what the evidence directly establishes from what is calculated or inferred, and make clear where the evidence has limits.

Methodology in detail

What counts as evidence

Our research starts with the source closest to the fact being examined. We prioritize laws, regulations, ministry notices, agency guidance and official statistics, consulting original-language documents rather than relying on translations or summaries. We examine what each policy changes, when it takes effect, who it applies to and how it affects investment or market access. Corporate filings and announcements provide additional evidence on ownership, project status and developments on the ground.

Where primary sources are unavailable or incomplete, particularly when assessing project delays, closures or problems with policy implementation, we use credible reporting and seek independent confirmation where possible. We search broadly to identify developments that might otherwise be missed, then verify specific claims against the best available evidence. Automated tools help us find and organize information, while our analysts assess the sources and determine what the evidence supports.

How we handle the numbers

Investment approvals, pledges, realised investment, balance-of-payments FDI flows, FDI stock and project counts measure different things. Before comparing countries or years, we check definitions and coverage, including whether figures are preliminary or final, how countries and sectors are classified, and whether investment is attributed to the immediate investor or the ultimate owner. Where definitions differ, we flag the differences rather than combine incompatible figures.

For any figure we calculate, we retain the original data series and denominator so the calculation can be checked. We also distinguish observed patterns from evidence of causation. An increase in investment following a policy change, for example, does not establish that the policy caused it.

When the picture isn’t complete

We make gaps in the evidence explicit. When ownership cannot be fully traced, we identify what remains unknown. We flag missing or inconsistent sector classifications rather than make unsupported assumptions. Where approved and realised investment cannot be matched at the project level, we report that limitation rather than imply a relationship the data cannot establish. Each finding is linked to its source and date so readers can check the evidence behind it.

Discuss your research needs

Tell us the markets, sectors and decisions involved. We will tell you whether we can help and how we would approach it.

Get in touch →